home    I    about us     I     staff     I     news     I     publications     I     projects     I     donors and partners     I     contact us      I     albanian
Media Watch
>> Alerts and Statements
>> Briefing Papers
>> Reports
>> Research and Studies
>> Press Review
Media Research
>> Media Legislation
>> Media Ethics
>> Media Development and      Independence
Media Monitoring

Monitoring children coverage in albanian newspapers...
Crime and court reporting...
Education and training
    of journalists...

Corruption reporting...
Reporting and privacy...
Reporting on social issues...
                                                ... more

Copyright: Albanian Media Institute - Instituti Shqiptar i Medias, 2011
media legislation
Albanian media code of ethics
     News & info
Two seminars on gender portrayal in media

Representatives of fourteen member organisations of SEENPM met on 30 October in Tirana for an annual meeting of the General Assembly.  As the highest decision-making body in the network's governing structure, the GA reviewed SEENPM's activities in the previous year, including the implementation of the network's 2014-6 strategic plan and finances.

Corina Cepoi, the outgoing president of the SEENPM Board, highlighted a number of projects that the network implemented in 2014, including SEE Media Observatory, EU Investigative Journalism Awards in Western Balkan and Turkey, Partnership for Media Development and Reporting Neighbours in Balkan Media as well as initiatives on hate speech and digital regulation and efforts to determine and address capacity building needs of SEENPM members. Tihomir Loza, executive director, provided updates on the current activities of the SEENPM Secretariat, including fundraising and plans to improve the network’s internal and external communication.

The General Assembly also voted to elect three new members to the five-member SEENPM Board. Mladen Velojić of Media & Reform Center, Serbia; Barış Altıntaş of Platform 24, Turkey; and Ljiljana Žugić of the Montenegro Media Institute replaced three members whose terms had expired: Corina Cepoi of IJC Moldova, Ilona Moricz of the Centre for Independent Journalism, Hungary; and Ioana Avadani of the Centre for Independent Journalism, Romania.

The new board held its first session after the GA meeting, electing Ines Bamburać, executive director of Mediacentar Sarajevo, as its president. “I am looking forward to working closely with the network’s governing bodies and executive director to enable SEENPM to continue playing a key role in advancing media freedoms and professionalism at a time when the media sector throughout the region faces a number of tough challenges,” said Ines Bamburać.


The Council of Ministers has proposed new amendments to the Penal Code, which aim to criminalize again defamation. Moreover, the aim of the new amendment is to grant specific protection against defamation to high public officials. The government submitted the amendments to the parliament on October 14, while the discussion in the Parliamentary commission on Legal Affairs is planned to take place on November 16. The proposal follows remarks made by Prime Minister Edi Rama in a plenary session in parliament on February 12 that he was examining the possibility of reverting to criminal regulation of defamation. His speech addressed the political debate in the parliament, where continuous verbal assaults and exchange of charges between political rivals has become the norm.

The amendment in question proposes to add Art. 238/a to the Chapter of the Penal Code “Crimes against state authorities.” The proposal for the article is the following:
Defamation against a high or elected state official

The defamation, made in a worldly manner, against a high or elected state official, with the aim of attributing him a fact that the law stipulates as a penal offence, is sanctioned by fine or imprisonment up to three years.

According to the report that accompanies the proposed amendment, this is a direct initiative of the Prime Minister, as he has said publicly before. The report claims that there have been grave violations of the defamation against high public officials since the decriminalization of libel, and punishment through civil lawsuits has been insufficient. Hence, the government views it as a necessary step to reintroduce criminal defamation regulation. Another argument is that the Code retains protection for offending the court, so the same protection should be enjoyed by the government. The report states that since the effects of penal cases are more serious than those of civil cases, this will lead to prevention of defamation.

The news on this amendment has sparked instant reaction and opposition from media community and there have been calls for protests from heads of associations. The Albanian Media Institute and Soros Foundation, who were the main supporters and drivers of the decriminalization of libel and defamation in 2012, have submitted their opinion to the Parliamentary Commission on Legal Affairs, upon the request of this commission, drafted by Darian Pavli, a well-known freedom of expression lawyer. According to this legal opinion, the initiative is a hasty one, with technical shortcomings and with a very negative impact on many aspects related to freedom of expression.

This is certainly a very negative development in the area of freedom of expression. The amendment extends special protection to high officials, at a time when they should be more open to public scrutiny and criticism. As the legal opinion submitted to the commission details, apart from the general effect on climate of freedom of expression there are also several problems with the proposed amendment: 

- The current proposal extends protection only high and elected state officials, compared to old provisions that referred to employees carrying out a state or public duty.  This means that the amendment aims to defend especially those officials that should be more exposed to public criticism, while denying the same protection to ordinary public employees.

- There is no clear definition of the “high official,” and what that includes.

- The amendment does not directly relate defamation to the duty and function one has. The proposal sanctions those statements that aim to attribute a fact that the law stipulates as a penal offence, without specifying that the defamatory statement must be related to the function one has in public and state institutions, and not include all criminal offences.

- Another problematic aspect is that the prosecution can start to investigate it and take it to court as crime against state authority. Given the recent history of prosecution cases that intimidated journalists and the risk for politicizing prosecution, this is of great concern.

- The sanctions proposed in the amendment, which can lead up to three years of prison term, are very severe and unacceptable in the light of ECHR case law, which will certainly have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and its exertion.

For all of these reasons, the adoption of this draft law as it is would be very hasty and a major setback on freedom of expression standards in the country. While there are always arguments for amending laws and specific provisions, doing them without public consultation and in a way that goes clearly against freedom of expression in order to protect officials is certainly the wrong way to change legislation.

Government proposes problematic amendments to penal code regarding defamation
Regional conference on labor relations in the media

A regional conference on labor relations in the media was organized in Tirana on October 29-30. The conference brought together more than 50 media editors, journalists, trade union representatives, and civil society members dealing with labor rights and media, as well as representatives of international organizations focusing on media rights. The main aim of the conference was to present the main findings of a regional research on labor conditions of journalists and media employees, as well as expand the discussion to include other actors that are involved and can affect the situation. The topics of discussion included such issues as current situation and main challenges in labor relations in the media, difficulties in contracts and in respecting the terms of payment, freedom of journalists to report without endangering their job, etc.

Specific attention was paid to online media as the new and often problematic field in terms of labor rights, and the other kind of workers in the media field. The ability of journalists to organize and the problems in this field were another main trend addressed during the conference, discussing also any potential initiative or solution in the future. The whole discussion was made in the context of changing patterns in journalism in the framework of new technologies. At the end a set of recommendations was drafted that can be followed in the future. The conference is part of the South-East European Partnership for Media Development Project, which supports the development of independent and accountable media in the Western Balkans, led by Center for Independent Journalism in Romania, and supported by European Union.
Albania should reject bill introducing imprisonment for libel of public officials, says OSCE Representative and calls for full decriminalization
BookVIENNA, 12 November 2015 - OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Dunja Mijatovic today expressed concern about draft amendments to Albania's Criminal Code, and called on members of the Parliament to reject the bill which establishes imprisonment as a penalty for libel against public figures.

"Public bodies and officials should not enjoy additional protection from critical speech, on the contrary they should tolerate a larger degree of criticism than ordinary citizens," Mijatovic said. "Criminal sanctions for libel or defamation are excessive and disproportionate. They should be replaced by effective and appropriate civil or administrative law remedies."

If adopted, the proposal by the Council of Ministers would introduce prison terms of up to three years for "libel against a high state official or elected person". The bill will come up for a vote in the Parliament on 13 November.

"I call on members of the Parliament to reject the new proposal and instead consider fully repealing criminal defamation," Mijatovic said. In 2012, the authorities in Albania decided to abolish prison sentences for defamation offences, a decision that was welcomed by the Representative (www.osce.org/fom/91144).

The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media observes media developments in all 57 OSCE participating States. She provides early warning on violations of freedom of expression and media freedom and promotes full compliance with OSCE media freedom commitments. .
SEENPM Holds General Assembly in Tirana
Two seminars on gender portrayal in the media were organized on October 21, and October 27, respectively. The seminars brought together journalists covering social issues and representatives of civil society dealing with human rights and gender issues. The topic of the seminars was "Media and Women NGOs: How media and NGOs work to address women issues." The seminars served as a platform of discussion where both the media and civil society actors covering gender issues discussed the existing problems in communication between one another, addressing also potential solutions. In the framework of the seminars the participants also became familiar with the findings of a monitoring of how gender is portrayed in the media, what are the main problems, shortcomings, and how they can be overcome.

In addition, participants also discussed the various aspects of work done by women NGOs in the country, the progress through the years, the main programs, the difficulties, challenges, and sometimes failures in this field. Both media and civil society representatives discussed their challenges, lack of information and difficulties in communication, highlighting the need to improve the communication and reporting in this area. The seminars were organized by Albanian Media Institute, with the support of UNESCO.